Investigation of ultra‑lift Luo‑converter with peak, average and hysteresis current‑mode control


Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 951-963, Jun. 2021
10.1007/s43236-021-00235-7




 Abstract

The Renewable energy system, electric vehicle, and telecommunication applications require relatively stable power converters with a high gain and enhanced noise immunity. A study of three different types of current-mode controllers for high-gain ultra-lift Luo-converter (ULC) is discussed in this paper. The stability of a constant frequency peak current-mode controller (PCM), an average current-mode controller (ACM) and a variable frequency hysteresis current-mode controller (HCM) are analyzed based on small-signal characteristics. Using mathematical modeling of the controllers, the closed-loop transfer functions such as control voltage to output voltage, current loop gain, inductor current to control voltage, and audio susceptibility are obtained. These transfer functions along with MATLAB simulation results for PCM, ACM and HCM controllers are compared. Then, the component losses of the ULC converter using PCM, ACM and HCM controllers are calculated and an efficiency comparison of different control techniques is done. Investigations of the voltage and current stresses of the switch and diodes are also carried out. Finally, a prototype is fabricated to validate the performance of the converter.


 Statistics
Show / Hide Statistics

Cumulative Counts from September 30th, 2019
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.



Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

J. Raji and V. Kamaraj, "Investigation of ultra‑lift Luo‑converter with peak, average and hysteresis current‑mode control," Journal of Power Electronics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 951-963, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s43236-021-00235-7.

[ACM Style]

J. Raji and V. Kamaraj. 2021. Investigation of ultra‑lift Luo‑converter with peak, average and hysteresis current‑mode control. Journal of Power Electronics, 21, 6, (2021), 951-963. DOI: 10.1007/s43236-021-00235-7.